By Ellen Hopkins
"If you don't like content in a book, don't read it. If you don't want your child to read a book, take it away. But you do not have the right to decide 'appropriateness' for everyone. What's perhaps not right for one child is necessary to another. Ignorance is no armor. And those whose lives are touched by the issues I write about deserve to know they are not alone." - Ellen Hopkins, "An Anti-Censorship Manifesto".
Ellen Hopkins is the author of many bestselling books such as Crank and Glass. In 2010 Hopkins was "dis-invited" to many speaking engagements such as at a school in Oklahoma, and a Teen Literature Festival in Texas. Soon after she wrote the non-fiction article "Banned Books Week 2010: An Anti-Censorship Manifesto" supporting her books and the things they contained. She gives examples of how her books have inspired readers, and in a ways saved their lives. She also shows how even though her books have deep, mature issues like drugs, abuse and thoughts of suicide, they teach young adult readers valuable lessons too. "But they bring young adult readers a middle-aged author's broader perspective. They show outcomes to choices, offer understanding. And each is infused with hope."
Throughout the article she uses craft moves that many writers use in order to get her point across. In the beginning she uses the small moment about the woman who approached her after one of her book signings. The small moment really shows how her book inspired the woman to get her life back in shape, and in the end she is graduating high school, 2 years sober (she had a drug addiction). She shows the process of her book being banned, and then in the end showing the other authors joining together and boycotting the Teen Literature Festival. This shows how the authors came together for something they really/genuinely believed in.
Apart from the writing techniques, I strongly agree with Ellen Hopkins. I think she makes many valid points about how people shouldn't deprive people across the nation of a book, just because of their personal opinions/preferences. I also agree that the people who are banning these books aren't actually reading the books and reading the content, but instead skimming through it and picking out the "inappropriate" aspects. For example, in the news video we watched in class, the girl (being interviewed) was challenging the book Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury (a classic book) because on the first couple pages the burning of the bible was mentioned. Maybe if she had kept on reading, that book would have changed her life. I believe (as Hopkins said in the quote above) that just because you have certain opinions about what teens should be reading, doesn't mean that you can judge the appropriateness for others.
Ellen Hopkins is the author of many bestselling books such as Crank and Glass. In 2010 Hopkins was "dis-invited" to many speaking engagements such as at a school in Oklahoma, and a Teen Literature Festival in Texas. Soon after she wrote the non-fiction article "Banned Books Week 2010: An Anti-Censorship Manifesto" supporting her books and the things they contained. She gives examples of how her books have inspired readers, and in a ways saved their lives. She also shows how even though her books have deep, mature issues like drugs, abuse and thoughts of suicide, they teach young adult readers valuable lessons too. "But they bring young adult readers a middle-aged author's broader perspective. They show outcomes to choices, offer understanding. And each is infused with hope."
Throughout the article she uses craft moves that many writers use in order to get her point across. In the beginning she uses the small moment about the woman who approached her after one of her book signings. The small moment really shows how her book inspired the woman to get her life back in shape, and in the end she is graduating high school, 2 years sober (she had a drug addiction). She shows the process of her book being banned, and then in the end showing the other authors joining together and boycotting the Teen Literature Festival. This shows how the authors came together for something they really/genuinely believed in.
Apart from the writing techniques, I strongly agree with Ellen Hopkins. I think she makes many valid points about how people shouldn't deprive people across the nation of a book, just because of their personal opinions/preferences. I also agree that the people who are banning these books aren't actually reading the books and reading the content, but instead skimming through it and picking out the "inappropriate" aspects. For example, in the news video we watched in class, the girl (being interviewed) was challenging the book Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury (a classic book) because on the first couple pages the burning of the bible was mentioned. Maybe if she had kept on reading, that book would have changed her life. I believe (as Hopkins said in the quote above) that just because you have certain opinions about what teens should be reading, doesn't mean that you can judge the appropriateness for others.
